AC Bridge International Group Publishes Report on Cultural Differences Between China and Australia to Improve Cross-Cultural Understanding
PR93863
AC Bridge International Group Publishes Report on Cultural Differences Between China and Australia to Improve Cross-Cultural Understanding Among Companies in Both Countries
MELBOURNE, Australia, Dec. 24, 2021 /PRNewswire=KYODO JBN/ --
AC Bridge International Group ("AC Bridge" jannounced the release of "China
and Australia Research Report on the Cultural Difference: Its Impact on the
Operation of Chinese Enterprises and Countermeasures," which sheds light on
some of the key cultural differences between China and Australia. The Report
analyses factors giving rise to contrasting values and practices of individuals
and organisations in the two countries. In publishing the Report, AC Bridge
aims to offer guidance to multinational companies eyeing business opportunities
in China and Australia to help bridge misunderstandings arising from cultural
and social differences and foster greater cross-cultural communications to
facilitate international investment.
Economic globalization deepens cooperation between China and non-Chinese
enterprises with diverse cultural backgrounds. Business and cultural
partnerships between China and Australia over the past five decades have
significantly strengthened the bilateral relationship and paved the way for the
prospect of closer economic cooperation. As more companies and organizations
from both countries seek to build up a broader consumer base in the two major
economies in the Asia-Pacific region, it has become crucial for them to
identify cultural and societal factors that lead to differences in systems,
behavior, and approaches conducting business.
One of the factors that poses a striking contrast between the two societies is
that China is a highly collectivist culture that values group cohesion over
individual pursuits. In contrast, in line with other Western nations, Australia
attaches greater importance to individualism that stresses autonomy and
independence. In contrast, China's tradition to respect structure means that
Chinese decision-makers prefer to follow guidance from higher hierarchies. If
decisions at the top are right and wise, they will be reflected in efficient
and robust execution; if decisions are wrong, they will lead to more
significant consequences yet remain uncorrected. Chinese also tend to emphasize
morality and personal duty, unlike Australia, where egalitarianism underpins
its national identity.
The Report defines China as a society with a high power distance in which
employees tend to have great respect for their superiors and those in authority
thanks to Confucianism, a dominating social and political philosophy adopted by
Chinese rulers for over two thousand years. Consequently, Chinese employees are
expected to conform to social norms and hierarchy while maintaining absolute
loyalty and obedience to those in authority. In contrast, in Australia, people
endorse a lower power distance culture due to the influence of Christian
values, which holds that all people are equal in fundamental worth and moral
status.
A relatively easy and equal social environment makes Australia a country with a
low-context culture, meaning that employees in managerial positions welcome
voices from lower-level workers and show adaptability. Communication between
employees tends to be clear and direct. However, Chinese employees are exposed
to a high-context culture in which straightforwardness is discouraged, are more
reserved and tend to ask questions in a non-conflict way in the workplace.
The Report also finds that people in Australia and China have different views
on their jobs and companies. Australians, like people in other western
countries, are driven by a passion for work and are more willing to make an
effort to achieve self-realization, which consequently catalysis corporate
reform and transformation. Nonetheless, Australia's traditional and
conservative culture means slow adoption of new things and skeptical of change.
Different generations in China have developed contrasting altitudes to their
career lives. The post-70s and post-80s are still working to 'survive better'
-- seeking job stability and worrying about changes. But the post-90s and
post-00s (Gen-Z) are rarely working for survival needs anymore. They
enthusiastically welcome changes. Therefore, different workforce demographics
have also resulted in different attitudes towards change within different
companies.
The media landscape in China and Australia is different in system, regulations,
and guiding principles. China upholds Marxist media theory, with Chinese
enterprises following the CPC's publicity guidelines. Journalism in Australia
enjoys specific liberty under the News Media Bargaining Code, and the media is
more decisive, more independent, and more assertive. Chinese unions are led by
the Chinese Government in a top-down effort to improve workers' welfare and
working conditions. On the other hand, Australian unions advocate for workers'
welfare by organizing strikes, protesting in CBD streets, and negotiating
directly with employers.
For more information, please feel free to download the full Report. We hope
that it will help Australian and Chinese companies in their brand new but
long-standing collaborations.
To read the Report, please visit http://www.business-circle.com.au/en/?p=5895
SOURCE: AC Bridge International Group
Image Attachments Links:
Link: http://asianetnews.net/view-attachment?attach-id=411828
Caption: AC Bridge International Group Publishes Report on Cultural Differences Between
China and Australia to Improve Cross-Cultural Understanding Among Companies in
Both Countries.
Link: http://asianetnews.net/view-attachment?attach-id=411830
Caption: n/a
本プレスリリースは発表元が入力した原稿をそのまま掲載しております。また、プレスリリースへのお問い合わせは発表元に直接お願いいたします。
このプレスリリースには、報道機関向けの情報があります。
プレス会員登録を行うと、広報担当者の連絡先や、イベント・記者会見の情報など、報道機関だけに公開する情報が閲覧できるようになります。